All Contributors
Harrypotterexpert101
The Dark Marc
MagnificentMagnus
• 10/14/2018

OT Post (Off Topic Thread!)



"We may not be able to save the world," said Calvin, " But that doesn't mean I can't save you. "


Ask a Mod/Admin a question!

thephoenixfiles.wikia.com/d/p/3186675253510204919


Mod Application!

thephoenixfiles.wikia.com/d/p/3186675253510204920


Welcome New Users!

thephoenixfiles.wikia.com/d/p/3186675253510205052


Discussion Guidelines!

thephoenixfiles.wikia.com/d/g


Ask a Mod/Admin a question!
Ask a Mod/Admin a question! @getfandom
0 10
  • Upvote
  • Reply
Harrypotterexpert101
The Dark Marc
MagnificentMagnus
0
• 10/18/2018

Hey Magnus! Where have you been?

0
• 10/18/2018

Off Fandom for a little.

0
• 10/18/2018

That's totally fine! It's good you got a break. I need you to go through and edit this article I posted though.

https://thephoenixfiles.wikia.com/wiki/The_Phoenix_Files_Wiki:Rules_and_Regulations

Thanks!

Rules and Regulations The Phoenix Files Wiki
0
• 2d

Hey there Dave,

Sorry I haven't been able to reply earlier. In anycase this is likely a better spot for the discussion anyway.. editing by phone is giving me the $#!t$.


Regards being an Admin, I originally thought only Admins had voting rights (like MODs selecting a new MOD), I've since discovered you only need 20 (MAIN) edits- which I've recently posted.


Clearly the Admins (and editors who hold all the votes) are highly resistant to the idea of the Discussion area having its own Admin.


I thought I had an angle to convince them.. but it didn't end up being enough to change the editor/Discussion poster bias, and I currently don't have an angle or the numbers to change anything.


Making a discussion post was an ok idea- but there just isn't the cross over of discussion members with enough edits to overcome the well entrenched old school editors who care nothing for Discussions or its members.


You can have my vote- but you need 3 clear votes above and beyond the 4 against votes that Seth, Ironyak, Samm and Harry Granger will surely put up to block us and retain the stranglehold they have on the wikia.

0
• 2d

Ok Marc, that is fine. Yeah, the discussion thing was a mistake... Is there anyone else you can think of that might support me?

0
• 2d
I think we'd need 7 'for'
Currently I can only think of 4 maybe 5 at best assuming they all come on board. The Discussions thing wasn't a mistake exactly- you never know if there might be that extra couple of votes out there with lurking editors.. but currently the gap is so vast it seems unlikely we'll close it up any time soon (like in time for your vote)
0
• 2d

So we have you, Magnus (Ironyak1 deleted his vote, on purpose), and that's it. I can think of a way to get one vote taken off (either Seth or Ironyak1 can't vote). Do you mind talking to the people you have in mind? They are more likely to listen to you rather than me. Thanks so much!

0
• 2d

Ok, if you have anything else to post, go ahead, but I need to go to bed. I will check this in the morning. Thanks so much!

Write a reply...